Comparison · for employers, health plans and benefits consultants
Levels vs Vida Health
Levels is a metabolic health benefit for your whole population, with a GLP-1 companion program for members on medication, backed by an IRB study of 62,236 members. Vida Health is a virtual clinic for members with obesity, diabetes and related conditions that acts as the sole GLP-1 prescriber, with lifestyle-first step therapy and a stated 16% prescription rate.
Decide in 20 seconds
- A benefit every member can use
- Levels
- CGM for every member, not only diabetes
- Levels
- Evidence with cohort sizes published
- Levels
- Sole prescriber with step therapy built in
- Vida
The short answer
Vida controls who gets the drug. Levels changes what happens to everyone, with or without it.
Vida Health enrolls members who clear a BMI or diagnosis threshold into a virtual clinic: weekly visits with a coach or dietitian, therapists for those who need them, and its own physicians as the only prescriber, usually after six months of nutrition therapy first. It reports that 16% of new members get a GLP-1. That's a gate, and gates work until members and clinicians push back on them, as Massachusetts state employees did in 2026. Levels gives every member CGM, labs, food logging and personalized guidance, adds a companion program for anyone on a GLP-1, and publishes the study behind it, limitations included. One decides who qualifies for the drug. The other works on everyone, whether or not they ever take it.
Levels fits when
You want results that outlast the prescription
- You already cover GLP-1s through your PBM and don't want a second prescriber deciding who qualifies. You want members who finish the year and keep the weight off.
- You want something the whole population can use, including members who don't clear a diagnosis or a BMI threshold.
- You want to see the evidence. Ours is a 62,236-member IRB study, and every cohort size is on the page.
- You want continuous glucose data for every member, not a device unlocked by clinical criteria.
Vida Health fits when
You want one gatekeeper for GLP-1 access
- You want a single clinical gatekeeper with step therapy built in: six months of nutrition therapy before a prescription is considered, and one prescriber for the plan.
- Your population is heavily comorbid and you want prescribing, dietitians and licensed therapists from one vendor, in English and Spanish, in all 50 states.
- You don't cover GLP-1s at all and want a defined monthly contribution toward cash-pay medication, with clinical oversight, that stays off your formulary.
- You want up to 100% of fees at risk and can live with per-account, undisclosed pricing.
At a glance
What each one hands you.
Functionality first, price last. Vida entries come from their own public materials, and we say so where they publish nothing. Levels entries come from the study behind the program.
What you’re comparing
Levels
Population benefit, GLP-1 companion
Vida Health
Virtual clinic, sole prescriber, step therapy
Who it covers
Devices and data
Care team
GLP-1 approach
Who prescribes
Published evidence
Biomarker outcomes
Below GLP-1 thresholds
Independent validation
Security and privacy
Reporting to you
Financial model
Vida Health entries come from vida.com and its programs, outcomes, devices, employer and consultant pages, plus public state-plan documents, read September 2026. They describe what Vida publishes. Where they publish nothing we say "not published" rather than claim the product can't do it. Vida's prescription-rate, weight and savings figures are its own reporting. Levels figures come from our IRB-approved study at levels.com/pro/outcomes, which is observational, participant-funded and has no control arm. The cohort size sits next to every number. If a row is out of date, tell us and we'll fix it.
What it costs
Where the money goes, and who carries the risk.
Neither company publishes employer pricing. Vida's is value-based, with up to all of the fee at risk. What you can compare is the shape of the deal: who it covers, what the fee rides on, and what each vendor's own numbers say about reach.
Levels · population benefit
62,236
consented members in the study behind the program. 1.15B glucose readings across 3.5 years.
- One benefit for the whole population, with the GLP-1 companion program included for anyone on medication, at whatever coverage level you set.
- Works with the prescribers and PBM you already have. No second clinic, no medication decisions handed to a vendor.
- Pricing is scoped to your population in consultation. The study is public before you ask.
Vida Health · up to 100% at risk
Not published
for the fee. Savings claims are internal estimates.
- Fees ride on clinical and engagement outcomes for members who clear the gate. The 16% prescription rate is the cost lever, and it depends on members accepting six months of step therapy.
- $2,040 in annual savings per engaged member and "up to $550 a month" avoided per member with obesity, from Vida's own pages, footnoted as estimates that may vary.
- A defined-contribution Self-Pay option, so the vendor deciding who qualifies for a drug is also the one routing members to buy it with cash.
The bill you already pay
Half of it stops early.
About half of members stop GLP-1 therapy within the first year, and most of the lost weight comes back. That's from the Peterson Health Technology Institute's December 2025 report and the STEP 1 trial extension, not from us. Careful prescribing changes who starts. Changing daily behavior changes who finishes, and what's left a year after the last dose.
Being fair
Where Vida Health is the better call.
Three situations where we wouldn't recommend Levels over Vida Health. Better you hear it here than mid-RFP.
You want one gatekeeper.
If your strategy is a single prescriber with step therapy in front of every GLP-1, Vida has run exactly that for a state plan and for Quantum Health clients. Levels doesn't prescribe or decide eligibility.
You need therapists and dietitians in one contract.
Vida bundles obesity medicine, medical nutrition therapy and licensed behavioral health, in English and Spanish, with its strongest peer-reviewed results in diabetes and depression. Levels is a metabolic health benefit, not a multi-condition clinic.
You want an off-formulary option.
If you don't cover GLP-1s, Vida's Self-Pay model lets you set a monthly contribution toward cash-pay medication under clinical oversight. Levels works with the coverage you have and doesn't broker the drug.
If one of those is you, take the Vida meeting, and ask what happened in Massachusetts. Come back when you want something the whole population can use, and a study your consultant can pull apart.
Working alongside
You can run both. Many populations should.
Vida is scoped to members who clear a diagnosis and its step therapy. Levels is scoped to everyone. Nothing here asks you to cancel a clinical program. The open question is what the rest of your population gets, and what happens to GLP-1 members once they stop.
- 01
Start with the members Vida doesn't cover
Launch the Levels wellness benefit to all eligible members. Anyone enrolled in a clinical program stays exactly where they are.
- 02
Wrap the GLP-1 members you already pay for
Add the companion program alongside your PBM coverage, from first dose through discontinuation. Every member gets a CGM, not only those who meet a device criterion.
- 03
Read the participation report at renewal
Eligibility, participation and spend in one view. Decide on your own numbers.
Questions we get
Four straight answers.
- Is Levels a replacement for Vida Health?
- Not one for one. Vida is a virtual clinic that prescribes and gates access. Levels is a population benefit that works with the prescribers you have. Many employers need the second even if they buy the first, because Vida covers members who clear its criteria and Levels covers everyone.
- Does Levels prescribe GLP-1s?
- No. Your PBM and your members' clinicians do. Levels works before medication, with CGM, labs and guidance, and alongside it, with nutrition, movement and side-effect support. The point is what's still true a year after the last dose.
- How does the evidence compare?
- Ours is an IRB-approved longitudinal study of 62,236 consented members and 1.15 billion glucose readings over 3.5 years. Cohort sizes, methods and limitations are at levels.com/pro/outcomes. Vida's peer-reviewed work is three retrospective diabetes and coaching studies from before its GLP-1 program. Its 16% prescription rate and weight figures are internal, with no methodology published. Read both.
- What does Vida Health cost?
- They don't publish it. Pricing is value-based and negotiated per account, with up to 100% of fees at risk. Vida cites $2,040 in annual savings per engaged member and up to $550 a month avoided per member with obesity. Both are its own estimates. Ask how "engaged" is defined and what the step-therapy requirement does to enrollment.
More comparisons for employers
Also on your shortlist?
- Read the comparison
Levels vs
DarioHealth
Multi-condition monitoring, GLP-1 pending
- Read the comparison
Levels vs
Wondr Health
Video curriculum, health-plan embedded
- Read the comparison
Levels vs
Twin Health
Virtual clinic for diagnosed members
Buying for a practice instead?See the Levels Pro comparisons
See the evidence next to the pitch.
Bring your GLP-1 utilization and population size. We'll show you what our study says, what it doesn't, and what a plan built around your members looks like.
30 minutes. No deck.